Thursday, October 4, 2012

Are Literary Masterpieces Still Possible in the Digital Age?



The release of J.K. Rowling’s first book for adults last week got me thinking about writerly work habits in the digital age. I haven’t read her new book yet, and I’m not going to get into what people are saying about it. I just want to talk about how it was written.
 
Not that I know for sure, of course, but it’s been five years since the final Harry Potter book came out, and one assumes that she spent most of that time working on this new one. After all, according to the popular mythology, Rowling took between five and seven years to develop her concept and then start writing the first Harry Potter book. This fact gets cited often as proof of how hard she worked to create an unprecedentedly successful book. In other words, it weren’t no accident.

You know it's got to be good cuz it's huge!
I’m sure editors mention this time investment because they probably get very, very tired of the slapdashery of novice writers who flood their inboxes with first drafts. But working tirelessly for years on a single book—or worse, spending that amount of time on plotting SEVEN books when you haven’t even sold the first one yet?

I doubt many agents would encourage anyone to do this nowadays.

And if they did, there aren’t many professional writers who could afford to do it, because even if there were such writers, at the end of the day, your book might not succeed and then you'd have wasted all that time. Because sometimes more time = your book has wandered way, way off into the wilderness and has turned into a mountain man who is all shaggy and feral and definitely NOT good company.

But the bigger question is, does anyone work like that anymore? These days, does anyone take an idea and incubate it for years upon years before attempting to get it published? Or is that kind of investment gone the way of the fax machine?

Again, I don’t believe that more time necessarily produces a masterpiece, but it sure doesn’t hurt.  

What I think is that the hunger to be published can ruin your chance to write something truly special, and maybe the ONLY opportunity you have to do something like this—ie., take years and years to perfect a single idea—is BEFORE you get published. Not after. So take advantage of your time now, while you can still afford to be great.

Thoughts?

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I think time will never be the enemy of necessary work.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
That is a lovely statement. I'll cut you in on half the profits from our t-shirt/bumper sticker merchandising, sound good? :)
Some of today's top literary writers seems to work this way: Jeffrey Eugenides, Jonathan Franzen, Junot Diaz. I feel like I read that Ben Fountain spent years and years on Billy Lynn's Halftime Walk. I think it depends on your market and also whether you have another source of income.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Another source of income. Indeed. I guess the greater point of my post was "time is money" and so who can afford to make great art anymore? But then art has never really been "affordable."

It's just, so many people are like, "I don't want to pay more that $4.99 for ANY book!" Do people fully realize how long it takes to write a great book?

Good to know you're alive and well, Lt.! I was relieved when I heard they were looking for your body under Jimmy Hoffa's old house but came up empty.
I did ask. And you answered.

Most of my ideas are the gooey kind.
"Maybe the ONLY opportunity you have to do something like this—ie., take years and years to perfect a single idea—is BEFORE you get published." That's a sad truth. Once you're published, your agent and editor want the next book and the next and the next (so I've heard). I do know some authors who take 3-4 years to write a book (although not seven), but I also know several literary authors who have been unable to sell their latest novels, even after being previously published, and have turned to writing commercial books (YA, chick lit, fantasy) to make a buck. Seeing more and more of it. I admire the writers like Junot Diaz (who just won a MacArthur Genius grant) who continue to take years to write literary works. I hope they never stop.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
I often tell people, "Frankly, I probably would make more money as a nun than a writer."

It's a labor of love for sure. Sometimes, the harder the job, the less you get paid for it. Which is why us moms make zippo. :)
I think you can still do it. It helps if you're a great writer. Like Michael Chabon, whose new "Telegraph Avenue" I would term a masterpiece. (See my review of it here: http://tinyurl.com/8qal5lu .) Then there's that "Kite Runner" book. Granted, most books are of the celebrity bio sort, but once in awhile something worthwhile breaks through.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Yes, but it's almost the exception rather than the rule. Which is kind of sad.

I will go read your review of Chabon's latest right now. I will probably read it even though many of the Amazon reviews are pretty harsh. (That's another thing that really irritates me -- people giving a book 1 star because they didn't like something. OK fine, maybe that's how you roll, but to claim that 'it's poorly written" -- WHAT?! There are plenty of books that I didn't necessarily like but I know good writing when I see it, even if the story didn't end up being near and dear to my heart. But that's a cranky post for another day....)

Post a new comment

Comments by