Friday, September 7, 2012

Unconventions in Your Writing



No one, and I mean no one, is as disappointed as I am that we still have yet to reach the age of the hovercraft. 

As a kid I fully expected that by the time I was an adult, I’d be regularly driving a hovercraft or, at the very least, using a jet pack to get to work.

I blame you, George Lucas, for giving us false hope.
Yet here it is, 2012, and still no stinking hovercraft.

There is something about the idea of hovercraft that we love. I guess it’s the closest thing we can  imagine to unfettered flying. It’s the magic carpet of the modern age, and just about every science fiction novel or movie features them. And it's for that reason that I, as a writer of science fiction or sci-fi or SF or whatever the cool kids want to call it, tend to avoid them.

Yes, my brothers and sisters, hear these words that I’m speaking from my little bloggy pulpit: there will be no hovercraft in my SF novels.

I’m not saying that having hovercraft in your novel is necessarily wrong, and believe me, if and when hovercraft go into mainstream production, I'll be the first in line to buy one of the dang things. I don't care if I’m 94 years old. But let's be honest, they’ve become a bit of a cliché, and that’s why I don't want to use them in any of my stories. That and my extreme bitterness about still not having one.

Is there anything you avoid in your writing for similar reason? Some convention of your particular genre that you shun just because it’s become ubiquitous?

**As ever, to leave a comment, click on the post title first. The comment box will come up at the bottom. Thank you for your cooperation and continued support during this time of 
economic downturn.** 

Comments (8)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Lovercrafts. I avoid lovercrafts, those ubiquitous, formulaic love interests. Not all stories need a lovercraft. That's what I think.
1 reply · active 655 weeks ago
I'm pretty sure that the Geneva Convention calls for AT LEAST two (three would be better) hot guys in hot pursuit of the hot MC. Plus there needs to be a lot of lip gloss and skinny jeans.

You'd best be careful no one flips you into the authorities.
Just say no to leukemia in YA lit. I agree. Let's do a telethon.

Of course the Jetsons! I forgot about that futuristic LIE as well. Although I think Rosie the sassy Robot maid is what I really need these days.
I want a hovercraft too! And good for you for avoiding cliches. =)
Insta-love. I absolutely never want to write a YA book where a smoldering look on first acquaintance is all the prelude we need to imagine two teenagers are soul mates.
I'm a little adverse to happy endings - not all happy endings but the kind that are overly simplistic, the kind you see in romantic comedies. I want endings to be a little more complicated than that - some good things, some bad things, some things left open-ended. I guess that's why I like reading literary fiction.
Androids. Cuz you know the first ones on the market are gonna be love slaves for nerdy shut-ins, beginning the end of civilization.

Post a new comment

Comments by