Wednesday, March 7, 2012

You Can Lay Down Your Pitchfork Now, The Revolution is Over

All right, I’m callin’ it. Time of death: First fiscal quarter 2012.

The digital publishing revolution is now over. Thank you and please turn in your scythes to the man at the back of the room before exiting in an orderly fashion.

I’ve been blogging for a little over two years, and I can’t help but notice the huge change that’s taken place in the last six months. The sense of urgency in discussing The Future of Publishing has all but evaporated. I’ve read a number of blog posts about blogging being dead. Maybe that’s true, and if it is, it’s probably yet another indicator that the brave new world of publishing is finally at hand.

Thank God.

Now everyone will stop talking about how self-publishing will transform the landscape; if people will prefer e-readers so much that paper books will disappear; how literary agents fit into this new world order; whether anyone will ever make any money in this business (did they ever?); and the exponentially-increasing burden on authors to market their own work because publicity help from publishers will evaporate in this mad, chaotic scrum to reach an ever-shrinking pool of disenchanted readers!

And!

And!

Sentient apes will overpower humanity! Or sentient robots! Depending on which of those you prefer. (Hmmm. I guess I’ll go with the robots.)

It’s done. It’s over. Everyone’s going to be all right. We can all stop noshing on our fingernails.

I like my “real” books. I like my Kindle. Some books will make a lot of money. The majority won’t. Some authors are better at marketing than others. Some books will be over-hyped flops and some will be sleeper hits. If you haven’t already made your fortune in e-publishing, you’re too late. 

And here’s the most incendiary notion of all: agents and publishers will continue to be the gate keepers of quality and a lot of people will continue to hate that idea like poison.

What do you think? Are we really there yet? Also, apes or robots, what's your preference?

Comments (9)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
You are good and right. You don't need to worry about any of this nonsense.

Also, the apes will keep you as a pet, I'm sure.
Robots. Apes can't do it because we'd totally design a disease that wipes them (and probably 99% of the other primates) out, but manage to vaccinate most of the humans from this doomsday disease.

Robots on the other hand, well, they're harder to kill (even if you are Christian Bale, AKA Batman).
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
The other thing about apes? Man, they smell like apes. Which, again, is why I prefer robots, which have only a slight odor of WD40.
I'll actually go with dolphins and whales over apes or robots. Just watched a fascinating Discovery Channel program on how there's proof they're sentient. Perhaps not what you wanted to hear, but I'm really not interested in the e-publishing phobia. Change is always scary but it's inevitable.
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
Sentient dolphins? For serious?

Great. Now we have to worry about the rise of killer dolphins. Because sentience always leads to vengeance (hey, I think that rhymes). Like I don't have enough to worry about with the whole Death of Traditional Publishing debate going on.
I guess I'd go for robots. First, I'd challenge them to a game of Words With Friends and they'd get all confused when I'd play QI and then I'd take them out for good by laying it on a triple word score. Forget about e-readers. Nobody's actually reading on those things anymore. They're playing WWF.
2 replies · active 682 weeks ago
What is this Words with Friends game? Is this a real thing?

*KLM goes and googles some stuff to see if unsweptstone is just having her on*

Well, OK. It's not a joke. Obviously I don't have a smartphone or I'd have known this.

I will make a mental note not to play this or any app game with either robots or apes. Thanks for the head's up.
Wow, I guess I just assumed you weren't Amish, but now I'm wondering, particularly in light of the national incident that was this: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-57338377-5...

Post a new comment

Comments by